Countryloves

 At a time when the world is holding its breath watching the war in Ukraine, President Volodymyr Zelensky once again finds himself in a position every leader dreads: standing at a crossroads where both paths are littered with loss. On one side is a U.S.-backed peace proposal that looks attractive on paper but is vague and riddled with uncertain conditions. On the other is the possibility of having no agreement at all—meaning an open-ended war that will continue draining Ukraine’s military strength, economy, and national morale.

U.S. President Donald Trump, who has long sought to carve out a legacy as a “peacemaker,” has decided to step back from the Thanksgiving deadline he himself set for a Ukraine peace deal. This is not a significant concession but rather a clear sign that the ongoing talks between his envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian officials in Moscow are unlikely to produce any real breakthrough. The distance between the two sides remains, and each round of negotiations seems only to widen it.

Russia continues to insist on full control of the Donetsk region—a demand Ukraine and almost all European allies consider an immovable red line. In the leaked U.S. draft plan from last week, the concession of Donetsk had already been removed, likely because Washington understood that such a demand would make any proposal toxic and impossible to sell to Kyiv or Europe. But America deleting that clause does not mean Moscow will suddenly soften its stance. Throughout more than 10 years of conflict, Russia has launched three major incursions into Ukraine, and that history alone is enough to cast doubt on the sincerity of any Kremlin “ceasefire” offer.

The deadlock repeats endlessly: the U.S. negotiates one set of terms with Kyiv, then another with Moscow, hoping the two puzzle pieces might somehow fit. But war is not a jigsaw. The shattered pieces of interests, sacrifices, and fear cannot be forced into a tidy arrangement dreamed up at a conference table. This illusion of compatibility is why peace efforts always feel within reach—right until they evaporate the moment reality intrudes.

Many items in the draft deal exist only in theory: Ukraine’s future troop limits, the prospect of NATO membership, or whether Russia might be welcomed back into the G8. These issues—important as they are—remain purely speculative. History shows such commitments can easily shift or disappear altogether once confronted with the post-war realities of politics and economics. The only question that truly matters is whether any agreement can actually end the war.

That is the painful dilemma Zelensky must confront. Every proposal forces him into a cruel choice: surrendering part of Ukraine’s territory in exchange for a peace that may not last, or continuing to fight with depleted forces, risking even greater territorial and human losses. Neither option is desirable. In fact, both are tragedies in their own way.

While diplomats struggle to find a path forward, Ukraine’s domestic landscape grows more suffocating. A corruption scandal has resurfaced after investigators searched the home of the President’s Chief of Staff—who also happens to be the head negotiator. For Kyiv, where every resource is stretched to its limit by war, any internal fracture threatens public trust and weakens its negotiating position.

The military situation is equally grim. Ukraine faces a severe manpower shortage, while European financial support for next year remains uncertain. On the battlefield, Russia is applying pressure on three fronts at once: advancing rapidly in Zaporizhzhia, inching forward steadily in Pokrovsk, and tightening its grip near Kupiansk in the north. Kyiv cannot stretch its forces thin enough to withstand three intense offensives simultaneously. The remaining Ukrainian-controlled areas of Donetsk are also in peril as Kramatorsk continues to endure short-range drone strikes.

Few still believe Ukraine can reclaim lost territory anytime soon. Kyiv and its allies are now pinning their hopes—however risky—on the idea that Russia might exhaust itself first. Yet with a closed society like Russia, no one can predict where its breaking point lies. The 2023 Wagner rebellion proved this clearly: events once deemed impossible can erupt within mere hours of chaos.

But Ukraine cannot simply sit and wait for a miracle. Its challenges are all laid bare: a weary population, severe economic strain, internal tensions, and growing doubts about long-term defense capacity. Zelensky is not only fighting Russia’s army; he’s also fighting the ambiguity and complacency of international politics—where the existential needs of one nation are too often overshadowed by great-power calculations.

As the year nears its end, the picture grows darker. The idea of forcing Ukraine to cede territory for peace—once dismissed outright by Kyiv and Europe—has now slipped into the U.S. draft peace plan. Though it was omitted in Europe’s counterproposal, it remains at the core of Russia’s maximalist demands. A familiar cycle is about to repeat: Trump’s envoy will visit Moscow, Putin will restate his refusal to compromise, Washington will receive the message, Zelensky will face renewed pressure, and the world will brace for yet another “peace deadline” destined to pass without meaning.

In all this uncertainty, one truth remains constant: Ukraine does not have the luxury of walking away. Russia can decide to stop whenever it wants. Ukraine cannot. For them, this war is a question of national survival. They cannot choose retreat. They cannot choose fatigue. They cannot stop fighting.

Zelensky is not choosing between good and bad. He is choosing between bad and worse. And whatever the outcome, history will remember that Ukraine paid a devastating price simply to continue existing—a price that may force the world to ask itself whether it truly did enough, or merely watched a nation struggle on alone.

 The war launched by President Vladimir Putin against Ukraine in February 2022 has now entered its fourth winter. In the early days, Moscow insisted confidently that the economy was “unshaken,” but reality is gradually revealing itself: the longer the conflict drags on, the more it inflicts pain on Russia in multiple dimensions. The impact is no longer confined to the battlefield or foreign economic reports; it has seeped directly into the daily lives of ordinary Russians, from large cities like Moscow to more remote regions. Many people are beginning to recognize that this is not the “swift operation” they were once told about, but a prolonged war of attrition that is making life harder every day.

The war is becoming more real to ordinary Russians

For much of the conflict, many Russians felt the fighting was distant—something happening outside their borders, far from their daily routines. That perception has changed. Today, regions in central and southern Russia regularly hear air raid sirens at night. Drone and missile attacks launched by Ukraine have become increasingly bold, targeting oil depots, energy facilities, and at times even residential areas. Such events were almost unheard-of in Russia for decades, and they are forcing citizens to confront the fact that the war is drawing closer—stripped of the “heroic” or “romantic” tones used in propaganda.

Neighborhoods losing electricity, fires erupting at fuel storage sites, and disrupted train routes have all become warning signs that the conflict is now knocking on Russia’s door.

Deep cracks appear in Russia’s economy after years of being concealed

During the first two years of the war, Russia’s economy appeared to be “holding up,” thanks to emergency fiscal measures. The government poured money into military factories, sharply increased wages for defense workers, and relied heavily on oil and gas revenues to offset the blow from Western sanctions. In 2024, wages in some sectors reportedly rose nearly 20%, giving many Russians the illusion that the economy was doing fine—perhaps even better than before the war.

But growth driven by war spending is nothing more than a thin blanket covering a feverish body. Beneath the short-term “prosperity” lie deeper structural problems the government cannot hide forever: businesses struggling to secure loans due to soaring interest rates, import shortages driving up prices across the board, and shrinking state revenues from oil and gas as sanctions intensify and global prices fall. Analysts warn that Russia’s economy is now operating in a state of “militarization,” meaning resources are increasingly funneled into the war machine while the civilian sector is starved and gradually weakened.

Rising living costs force Russians to change consumption habits

One of the clearest signs of economic deterioration is the sharp drop in household spending. Surveys from major Russian banks show that weekly grocery bills have doubled compared to a few years ago. But despite higher prices, the amount of food people buy has decreased significantly. Russians are cutting back on meat, dairy, fruits, and vegetables—items that were once considered basic staples.

A young woman near Moscow shared that she had to give up imported products, switch entirely to domestic goods, and drastically reduce spending on clothing and cosmetics because prices had become unaffordable.

This marks a major shift in a society long accustomed to easy access to international products. Data from X5 Group—the country’s largest supermarket chain—reveals that although revenue rose due to inflation, profits fell nearly 20% because of rising operating costs and shrinking consumer demand. The numbers point to an uncomfortable truth: Russia’s current “growth” is artificial. Prices are going up not because of stronger demand, but because the market is unstable and supply chains are strained.

Retail collapses as purchasing power plunges

Since the war began, more than 1,000 international brands have withdrawn or suspended operations in Russia, leaving a massive void in the retail sector. But the strongest blow came this year, when domestic brands also began shutting down. Reports show that nearly half of Russia’s fashion stores have closed in recent months. The electronics market—crippled by shortages of imported components—has fallen to its lowest level in almost 30 years. Russians are delaying major purchases like smartphones and home appliances, leaving many retailers with no choice but to shut down or scale back.

Automotive and energy sectors—two vital pillars—take heavy damage

Russia’s auto industry has nearly collapsed as global automakers exited the country. Car prices have surged due to taxes and the cost of imported parts, driving sales down by almost 25% this year. Imported cars and electric vehicles have become luxury items, inflated by environmental taxes, import duties, and shipping costs.

Meanwhile, the energy sector—Russia’s largest source of revenue—is taking repeated hits from Ukrainian drone attacks. These strikes have damaged refineries, export ports, and fuel depots, with some drones reportedly flying thousands of kilometers into Russian territory. As a result, domestic fuel prices have spiked, and some regions are even experiencing shortages. This disruption affects everything from transportation and logistics to industrial production.

Heavy industry falls into a quiet crisis

Key industries once seen as Russia’s “backbone”—steel, mining, and machinery manufacturing—are also declining. Domestic steel consumption has dropped more than 14%, and demand for machinery has fallen by up to 32%. The coal industry, a major employer in several regions, is experiencing its worst period in a decade, forcing many companies to cut production.

These declines are more than economic statistics—they threaten hundreds of thousands of jobs, reduce incomes, and expose industrial regions to prolonged recession.

Russian banks face rising bad-debt risks

The Central Bank of Russia has warned that corporate non-performing loans have surpassed 10%, amounting to more than $100 billion. This indicates that many businesses can no longer repay debts due to falling revenue and rising costs. Consumer loan defaults have also risen to 12%, showing that households are borrowing more but struggling to pay back as incomes shrink.

Rising bad debt forces banks to tighten lending, creating a vicious cycle that makes business conditions even harsher.

The budget deficit widens as oil and gas revenues plunge

From January to October, Russia’s oil and gas revenue dropped more than 20% compared to the previous year. Falling oil prices, a stronger ruble, and new U.S. sanctions have shrunk Russia’s export markets. The U.S.—under the political scenario referenced in the article—has intensified pressure by sanctioning major corporations like Rosneft and Lukoil, deepening the impact.

As a result, the budget deficit has climbed to nearly 2% of GDP and could reach 2.6% by year-end. To fill the gap, the government has issued large volumes of high-interest domestic bonds and is even preparing to issue yuan-denominated bonds.

New tax burdens fall on citizens and businesses

Even as ordinary Russians struggle, the government is preparing to raise VAT and expand taxation, hitting small businesses and consumers hardest. New technology taxes on electronics and increased car-purchase taxes are also on the way. This signals that prices for goods and services will continue to rise.

Reports suggest that the Kremlin has instructed state media not to mention Putin’s name when covering these tax measures—an indication that authorities are aware of growing public dissatisfaction.

Russia has not “collapsed,” but the economy is entering a period of deep weakening

Despite mounting challenges, experts say Russia is not on the brink of an immediate economic meltdown. However, the downward trend is clear and will likely continue in the coming years. A militarized economy weakens the civilian sector, oil-and-gas revenues are declining, war costs are rising, inflation remains high, taxes are increasing, and everyday life is becoming more difficult for ordinary citizens.

One Russian economist noted that the country is approaching a “warning threshold,” where the government may soon have to choose between sustaining the war or stabilizing the economy. And while that decision may not come right away, one thing is certain: Russians will continue paying the price for a war they never had a say in.

 Eggs have long been considered an essential source of nutrition in the daily meals of many households.

Egg white is the part that contains almost pure protein. According to nutritional data, one large egg white weighing around 33–35 g contains only about 17 calories but provides 3.6 g of protein along with all the essential amino acids the body needs. The most important point is that egg whites contain zero cholesterol, making them a top choice for people concerned about heart health or those who need to control blood lipid levels.

According to nutrition expert Shalini Sudhakar, research shows that the protein in egg whites can:

– support muscle building,
– reduce fatigue and oxidative stress,
– limit the accumulation of visceral fat,
– improve digestion and gut health.

For people trying to lose weight or maintain a low-fat diet, egg whites are an ideal option because they are light on the stomach, easy to digest, and do not cause sudden spikes in calorie intake.

BENEFITS OF EGG YOLKS

Unlike egg whites, the yolk is where most of the egg’s key nutrients are concentrated. One yolk weighing about 17 g contains 55 calories, 2.7 g of protein, roughly 4.5–5 g of fat, and 185 mg of cholesterol. Although it has a higher fat content, the yolk is a nutrient powerhouse, rich in vitamins A, D, E, K, B vitamins, and essential minerals such as iron, phosphorus, and zinc.

Notably, egg yolks are an excellent natural source of choline, a nutrient crucial for brain function, liver health, and metabolic processes. Recent studies also show that egg yolks contain various bioactive peptides that can:

– act as antioxidants,
– provide antibacterial effects,
– help stabilize blood pressure,
– strengthen the immune system,
– and potentially reduce the risk of certain cancers.

Despite containing cholesterol, modern studies indicate that consuming eggs in moderation does not significantly impact blood cholesterol in most healthy individuals.

EXPERT RECOMMENDATIONS

According to Sudhakar, breakfast with eggs becomes even more effective when paired with fiber-rich foods such as leafy vegetables, whole-grain bread, oats, or whole-grain cereals. This combination helps keep you full longer, supports healthier digestion, reduces blood sugar spikes, and improves overall nutritional balance.

Choosing egg whites or egg yolks depends on each person’s goals:

Egg Whites Are Ideal For:

– individuals trying to lose weight,
– those who want to build lean muscle,
– people needing a low-fat breakfast,
– individuals with high cholesterol or lipid issues.

Egg Yolks Are Ideal For:

– those who need stable energy throughout the morning,
– individuals wanting to increase vitamin D, B12, and omega-3 intake,
– people who need balanced nutrition,
– those who need better focus and cognitive performance.

2–3 EGG WHITES + 1 EGG YOLK: THE OPTIMAL NUTRITION FORMULA

To ensure a high-quality protein intake while still receiving essential vitamins and minerals, Sudhakar recommends combining 2–3 egg whites with 1 egg yolk for breakfast. This combination helps:

– boost high-quality protein intake,
– reduce overall fat and cholesterol,
– while still absorbing choline and key vitamins found only in the yolk.

According to NDTV, this is a smart choice for people who need to manage their weight or those at risk of heart disease—while still ensuring the body receives important nutrients.

  Recently, the atmosphere in East Asia has been tense like a tightly stretched string. Relations between China and Japan have become increasingly strained, with the issue of Taiwan acting as the potential spark for conflict. While Beijing has always regarded Taiwan as a territory that must be ‘reunified,’ Tokyo sees the stability of the Taiwan Strait as vital to its own national interests. Tensions have escalated further as China ramps up flights and naval deployments near the area, while Japan continuously expands its military presence around Okinawa and the Nansei Islands. But the story did not start today. The two countries carry a long and painful history dating back to World War II, when Japan invaded China, leaving behind deep wounds and millions of tragic memories. Those historical scars have never fully healed, and every time territorial or security disputes intensify, nationalistic sentiment in both countries surges once again.

All these elements have turned the military competition between Asia’s second- and third-largest economies into a hot topic — and the key reason why comparing China and Japan’s military strength in 2025 is more relevant than ever.

As the security rivalry in East Asia continues to heat up, the question “If Japan and China clash militarily, who would have the upper hand?” becomes increasingly important. Both nations possess significant military capabilities, but their approach to building armed forces is vastly different: China focuses on massive numerical power, while Japan follows a lean, high-tech model. The analysis below is based on 2025 data and the closest available sources where numbers are not fully updated.

China currently maintains a standing force of about 2.2 million troops, one of the largest in the world. This scale allows Beijing to sustain multiple fronts and specialized branches such as the Rocket Force and Strategic Support Force — something Japan cannot match in size. Japan, on the other hand, has only about 247,000 active personnel, but their training follows NATO standards and they operate more advanced technical systems. Tokyo’s organization is optimized for tight defense and precise counterattacks rather than overwhelming opponents with sheer numbers.

In terms of defense budgets, China spends around USD 230–240 billion annually — several times Japan’s USD 50–55 billion. However, this gap does not mean Japan is completely outmatched, as Tokyo channels its funds into extremely high-end systems like F-35 fighters, Tomahawk missiles and Aegis missile defense — some of the world’s most expensive military technologies. Meanwhile, China must divide its budget across numerous simultaneous programs, from aircraft carriers and hypersonic missiles to stealth drones.

The navy is the decisive domain should conflict break out, given Japan is an island nation surrounded by water, and China would need to rely heavily on long-range missiles and maritime operations. China now deploys three aircraft carriers (Liaoning, Shandong, Fujian), more than 50 destroyers, and about 60 submarines — including several nuclear-powered boats. In pure numbers, China operates the largest fleet in the world. Japan’s fleet is smaller but extremely capable: two Izumo-class helicopter carriers being upgraded to operate F-35B jets, around 40 top-tier destroyers, and 22 Soryu/Taigei-class submarines widely considered among the quietest in the world. A naval conflict would therefore be a showdown between China’s quantity and Japan’s high-end precision.

Airpower also shows a significant contrast. China fields more than 3,000 aircraft, including the J-20 stealth fighter and multiple long-range combat drones. Japan has just over 430 fighters, but relies on the F-35A and F-35B — the most advanced stealth aircraft available, excelling in maritime strike missions and network-centric warfare.

The most striking difference lies in long-range missiles. China leads Asia with missile systems like the DF-21D and DF-26, known as “carrier killers,” along with long-range cruise missiles and hypersonic weapons. Japan has only recently begun expanding its offensive range by acquiring Tomahawks and upgrading the Type-12 missile, but still cannot match China’s diversity or reach.

However, Japan holds a major advantage in missile defense. Aegis destroyers and Patriot PAC-3 batteries create multilayer protection capable of intercepting ballistic missiles at high effectiveness — among the best outside the United States. This means any long-range Chinese strike would face a complex, highly advanced defensive shield, far more difficult than simple theoretical simulations.

So, who would win? The answer is far from simple. China dominates in overall numbers, naval mass and missile force. But attacking a highly fortified island nation like Japan is extremely challenging. Japan excels in defensive warfare, especially in the waters near its territory where submarines and F-35Bs can operate at full strength. China could inflict significant damage with long-range missile barrages, but controlling the waters around Japan is uncertain — especially against Japan’s elite Aegis destroyers, considered some of the best missile-defense ships in the world.

In a real conflict, the battle would almost certainly revolve around long-range missiles and naval power. China would likely employ DF-21D or DF-26 strikes on Japanese bases, supported by destroyers launching cruise missiles. Japan would rely on Aegis interception and counterattack with Tomahawks and precision strikes from F-35s. Due to geography, ground forces would play minimal roles, and an amphibious landing on Japan is considered highly improbable.

Overall, China is superior in offensive power and missile range, while Japan holds the edge in defense, technology and terrain. If conflict erupted, it would not be a one-sided battle but a high-intensity confrontation between China’s long-range firepower and Japan’s multilayered defensive shield — a clash that would reshape East Asia’s strategic balance.

Although China’s conventional superiority is significant, one factor raising global concern is its expanding nuclear arsenal. Beijing now possesses several hundred warheads and is rapidly modernizing its intercontinental missiles and nuclear submarines. However, the likelihood of China using nuclear weapons against Japan is extremely low. Any nuclear strike would trigger a massive American response — given the U.S. alliance with Japan — and would isolate China internationally, inviting catastrophic retaliation. Nuclear weapons, therefore, remain a strategic deterrent, not a practical warfighting option in such a conflict.

Regarding alliances, a China–Japan war would almost certainly draw in multiple countries. Japan is bound by the U.S.–Japan Security Treaty, making American involvement nearly inevitable. Other nations like Australia, the U.K., Canada and parts of NATO may support Tokyo due to concerns about China’s regional ambitions. Conversely, China may receive political backing or limited support from Russia, North Korea and certain strategic partners, though direct military participation is unlikely.
This raises the question: “Could this lead to World War III?” In reality, a global war remains highly unlikely, as major powers understand that open conflict among nuclear states would be catastrophic. However, a large regional conflict — with numerous countries involved indirectly through intelligence, cyber warfare, naval forces, and economic sanctions — is entirely possible. In other words, not quite World War III, but certainly a major crisis capable of shaking the entire region and global economy.

 On November 21, Financial Times published an editorial that sent ripples across the entire region. The article simultaneously criticized China, warned Japan, and analyzed a series of emerging security risks surrounding Taiwan. This was not a routine commentary—it read like a geopolitical storm forecast: East Asia is entering a new era of instability, where interests and power matter more than ever.

At that sensitive moment, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi—well known for her hard-line style—appeared beside her car bearing the license plate number 37.77. To Chinese public opinion, this was anything but random. The number immediately evokes July 7, 1937, the outbreak of the Marco Polo Bridge Incident, the event that marked the beginning of the Second Sino-Japanese War. For Beijing, it is a painful historical memory; for Tokyo, choosing that number at this exact time is understood as a deliberate, wordless diplomatic message.

During a parliamentary session, Prime Minister Takaichi stated what generations of Japanese leaders had long avoided saying publicly:

“If Taiwan is attacked, Japan may fall into a situation where its survival is threatened.”

Under Japan’s 2015 Security Legislation, a “survival-threatening situation” is a condition that allows Tokyo to use force under the right of collective self-defense—even if Japan itself has not yet been directly attacked. In the words of Financial Times: Takaichi simply said aloud what all experts already understand — a Taiwan conflict would automatically pull Japan into the confrontation.

Beijing reacted fiercely. The Chinese Consul General in Osaka even posted a violent threat: “If you stick your filthy head into this matter, I will cut it off without hesitation.”
Although the comment was later deleted, it did nothing to stop the wave of anger spreading online. China has since tightened visa controls, exerted economic pressure, stepped up military presence, and continued its “wolf-warrior diplomacy” against both Japan and Taiwan.

Financial Times assessed that China’s reaction reflects increasing arrogance and a growing departure from diplomatic norms. But the newspaper also warned Takaichi: being right is not the same as choosing the right timing. Sino-Japanese relations are full of historical “detonators,” where a single strong statement can trigger a domino effect that sparks conflict.

The Marco Polo Bridge Incident

The Marco Polo Bridge Incident of 1937 was not merely a clash. It marked the beginning of a war that killed tens of millions and left a deep trauma in China’s national memory. For decades, Beijing has used these painful chapters to reinforce anti-“Japanese militarism” sentiment.

So when Prime Minister Takaichi—the head of the Japanese government—appeared in public with a number that precisely recalls that moment in history, it was a highly symbolic act. No speech was needed, no official statement; a single set of digits was enough to pull history back onto the negotiation table.

This “say little but say everything” gesture carries the classic signature of Japanese political communication. And it makes Beijing understand that Tokyo no longer intends to maintain the soft and cautious posture of the past.

Taiwan — the decisive flashpoint for Japan–China relations

Tokyo has repeatedly affirmed that Taiwan’s future is directly linked to Japan’s national security. This is not theory but strategic reality:

• Japan’s critical sea lanes pass through the Taiwan Strait.

• Tens of thousands of Japanese citizens live on the island.

• If the U.S. is drawn into a conflict, Japan will inevitably be affected — U.S. bases in Japan would become immediate targets.

• The Senkaku/Diaoyu dispute is already a flashpoint; the more aggressive China becomes toward Taiwan, the more likely the East China Sea is to erupt.

Financial Times notes that Takaichi is not exaggerating; she is merely articulating what Tokyo is compelled to confront.

Japan no longer fully relies on the American “umbrella”

One notable warning in the Financial Times editorial is that Japan can no longer rely wholly on the United States as it did during the Cold War. American politics is polarized, Washington’s strategic priorities are shifting, and its military commitments are now spread across multiple fronts.

Therefore, Japan must reinforce its own capabilities:
strengthening air and missile defense, coastal protection, expanding military cooperation with South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and the Philippines, and deepening defense technology ties with the U.S. without becoming entirely dependent.

This strategic shift explains why Tokyo is increasing its defense budget at the fastest pace in decades.

 In recent months, many small household businesses have voiced growing concerns over the proposal to maintain the current tax threshold at just over 200 million VND in annual revenue. To them, this figure no longer reflects the reality of today’s volatile market, where input costs have skyrocketed across the board. In countless sectors where profit margins are razor-thin, high revenue does not automatically translate to actual earnings. For many vendors, “money flowing in” is nothing more than numbers passing through their hands before being paid straight back to suppliers.

A vivid example is the livelihood of lottery ticket sellers—a job commonly perceived as low-income but surprisingly high in revenue once total daily sales are accumulated. A lottery seller typically earns only a few hundred to one thousand dong per ticket. To make around 70,000–80,000 VND per day, they must sell at least 70–80 tickets. On the surface, this seems manageable. But when multiplied over a full year, their total revenue easily surpasses the 200-million mark, despite their true profit remaining meager. This leaves many feeling “shocked” when told they fall under the category that requires tax declaration, even though their income barely supports basic living needs.

Small business owners argue that the current threshold is too low for present economic conditions. Consider a birthday flower bouquet priced at 500,000 VND; selling just two bouquets already registers one million VND in daily revenue. Meanwhile, the costs of wholesale flowers, transportation, storage, spoilage, and shop rent have surged dramatically. Some florists even buy a bouquet at 800,000 VND and only dare sell it at 820,000 VND to stay competitive—making a fragile profit of only 20,000 VND, which is less than 3%.

The situation is no better for coffee vendors, small restaurants, or convenience stall owners. Even the cheapest rental space today costs several hundred thousand dong per day. Hiring a single employee adds another significant expense. Combined, operating costs already push their minimum daily expenses toward 550,000–600,000 VND. Yet these vendors are still classified as businesses with revenue exceeding the tax threshold. Many point out that “revenue is just a flow of money,” not an accurate representation of real profit. The more they earn in total sales, the more they must spend immediately on inventory and operation.

To make matters worse, transitioning to issuing VAT invoices for input purchases pushes total expenses up by another 8–10%. Larger companies can absorb this due to VAT deductions, but small household businesses must bear the entire amount as actual cost. This puts them at a serious disadvantage in an already highly competitive market.

Clearly, the current 200-million-VND threshold is outdated given the rapid changes in cost of living and market prices. Business owners hope tax authorities will consider profit margins, the specific cost structures of each trade, and the real financial resilience of small vendors. A fair and reasonable tax policy should not only ensure equity but also protect the livelihood of millions who are struggling to survive amid rising expenses. Many vendors emphasize that they do not oppose taxation; what they fear is a tax mechanism that calculates solely based on revenue rather than genuine income.

In the broader economic landscape, small household businesses—especially daily wage earners like lottery ticket sellers—play a vital role in sustaining local economies. They operate quietly yet consistently, contributing to circulation of goods and services even during economic downturns. Ignoring their hardships could weaken the very grassroots economy that supports larger markets. For policymakers, revisiting the tax threshold is not just a matter of paperwork—it is an evaluation of social fairness and the nation’s long-term economic health.

A revenue-based tax system may have been appropriate in the past when input costs were stable and profit margins more predictable. But in today’s climate of rising fuel prices, fluctuating imports, and inflation affecting everything from rent to raw materials, the structure is losing its balance. Vendors repeatedly stress that taxing them based on revenue is like “judging a person’s wealth by the number of bills passing through their hands,” even though none of those bills stay long enough to build actual income.

If the threshold remains unchanged, many fear that genuine micro-businesses—including lottery ticket sellers, sidewalk vendors, small cafes, flower shops, and household stalls—will be pushed into unsustainable pressure. Some may shut down entirely; others may be forced into operating informally to avoid being categorized as taxpayers. Ironically, this could reduce overall tax collection and create regulatory blind spots—an outcome no one desires.

Ultimately, small vendors are calling for a tax policy that acknowledges their reality: high revenue but low profit, high effort but fragile income. They hope policymakers will listen closely, evaluate carefully, and adjust wisely. A well-designed tax policy should not drown the smallest contributors of the economy but instead help them stay afloat, ensuring livelihoods are preserved and communities remain stable.

 From the perspective of small business owners—those who constantly juggle capital, battle rising costs, and try to keep their word with customers—the current revenue threshold of 200 million VND per year for tax liability is being viewed by many National Assembly deputies as unrealistic. Put simply, if a household business only earns 200 million VND a year, then after covering all operating expenses, the actual amount left is barely anything.

On the morning of November 4, 2025, the Government submitted the amended Personal Income Tax (PIT) Law to the National Assembly, proposing comprehensive adjustments to 35 existing articles. Among the changes, the draft law maintains the 200-million-VND annual revenue threshold as the “non-taxable level” for household businesses, starting from January 1, 2026, when the current quota-based system will be replaced by self-declaration and self-payment.

Household businesses with annual revenue between 200 million and under 3 billion VND will be taxed directly on their revenue, with specific rates for each sector: distribution–wholesale–retail at 0.5%; services and construction without material supply at 2%; manufacturing–transportation–construction with material supply at 1.5%; property leasing and certain specific agency activities at 5%; digital content, online entertainment, electronic media, and digital advertising at 5%; and 1% for other sectors. Those with revenue from 3 billion VND and above will be subject to a 17% tax on profit.

Deputy Trần Văn Lâm (Bắc Ninh) argued that although reform is necessary, small household businesses—already at the “bottom rung” of the economic ladder—will bear the heaviest burden. Most of them merely earn enough to support their families, cover daily expenses, and have almost no savings.

He further explained that the actual profit margin of small businesses is only around 3–5%, or 10% at best. If taxes of 1–5% are imposed on gross revenue, nearly the entire profit would “evaporate.” Compared to enterprises with full accounting systems, taxing revenue directly places household businesses at a clear disadvantage.

Mr. Lâm also pointed out the discrepancy compared with salaried workers: an employee earning 10–11 million VND per month must pay income tax, while a household business with 200 million VND annual revenue—about 16.6 million per month—but real profit of only around 1.6 million, is still classified as taxable. Is that fair? They also have children to raise, parents to care for, and family responsibilities, yet they receive no equivalent family deductions.

Associate Professor Trần Hoàng Ngân agreed: 200 million VND sounds like a lot, but after paying electricity, water, rent, labor, and inventory costs, almost nothing remains. Compared with the new family deduction of 15.5 million VND per month (around 280 million per year), keeping the 200-million-VND threshold for household businesses is unreasonable. He suggested raising it to 300–400 million VND per year.

Professor Hoàng Văn Cường added that taxes should be levied on profit, not revenue. For example, someone selling 200 boxes of milk may have 200 million VND in revenue but only 10 million in profit—yet still has to pay tax. That is clearly illogical. He proposed that tax thresholds should be based on actual income.

From the viewpoint of small business owners, tax policies must reflect reality—fair, reasonable, and not “strangling” those who are simply trying to earn an honest living. Their concerns are entirely legitimate and deserve careful consideration by lawmakers.

 On the morning of November 13, according to Dân Trí newspaper, the police appeared at the headquarters of Mailisa Beauty Clinic in Ho Chi Minh City and its branch in Đắk Lắk Province to conduct an inspection. In Ho Chi Minh City, officers were seen at 86-88-92 Huynh Van Banh Street, now part of Phú Nhuận District. At the same time, in Buôn Ma Thuot City, Đắk Lắk Province, several police officers were also working inside the Mailisa branch on Ngo Quyen Street.

According to Tien Phong, the Ho Chi Minh City Police Department has not yet released an official statement explaining the reason for this inspection.

Who is Mailisa?

Mailisa is not just the name of a famous beauty clinic chain across Vietnam, but also the nickname of Ms. Phan Thi Mai (born in 1975) — the co-founder and current CEO of the Mailisa Beauty System, which she manages together with her husband, Mr. Hoang Kim Khanh. Established in 1998, Mailisa has become one of the most reputable beauty clinic chains in the country.

Ms. Phan Thị Mai, often called Mailisa, is a well-known figure in the beauty industry and on social media. She is famous for her luxurious lifestyle, owning large mansions and a collection of expensive supercars. Her husband, Mr. Hoàng Kim Khánh, is also a co-director of the Mailisa system and is recognized as a successful businessman with a strong passion for luxury cars.

Today, the Mailisa Beauty Clinic has branches all over Vietnam, offering services such as cosmetic tattooing, skincare, and advanced technology skin treatments.

From poverty to building an empire

According to Mailisa’s official website, Phan Thị Mai was born into a poor farming family in Tân Dân Commune, Đức Thọ District, Hà Tĩnh Province. She had one older brother, lost her father when she was 11 years old, and her mother could not read or write.

Growing up in hardship but full of determination to change her life, Mai left her hometown and moved to Saigon to start working. At first, she worked in a shoe factory, then became a housemaid and a waitress at a goat hotpot restaurant, saving only 900,000 VND after three months.

One day, after noticing how the price of balut eggs (hột vịt lộn) kept increasing, she came up with the idea of starting a small food business. With her tiny savings, she opened a street food stall, selling balut eggs, grilled corn, and snails. Thanks to her hard work, cleanliness, and friendly service, her stall quickly became popular.

However, when local authorities confiscated her food cart for taking up sidewalk space, Mai decided to take a new path. During the day, she attended hairdressing classes, and at night, she continued selling food to earn money. With her natural skill and good taste, she became a skilled hairstylist after just six months, and soon opened her own salon — the first major step toward building the Mailisa beauty empire that she runs today.

After receiving detailed reports from local authorities, Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh, on behalf of the Party and the State, commended the collective spirit, resilience, and timely response of the Gia Lai provincial government and its people in dealing with the devastating aftermath of Typhoon No. 13.

He emphasized that protecting people’s lives and safety remains the top priority, while urging all levels of government to move swiftly to restore housing, infrastructure, and livelihoods for affected communities.

The Prime Minister directed ministries, departments, and local governments to strictly comply with Directive No. 214/CĐ-TTg, dated November 12, 2025, focusing on accurate damage assessment, rapid relief, and the immediate recovery of typhoon-stricken areas in the central region.
He instructed all forces to reach out directly to affected families — especially those whose homes were destroyed, swept away, or severely damaged — to provide temporary shelter, food, and essential supplies. “No one should be left hungry, cold, or without a roof over their head,” he stressed.

Local authorities were told to compile precise lists of heavily damaged households to ensure timely financial support under state policy. At the same time, additional assistance from the Vietnam Fatherland Front, businesses, philanthropists, and community organizations should be mobilized to help residents rebuild their homes.
For households that can no longer live safely in their original locations, local governments must arrange resettlement land in secure areas and promptly develop resettlement zones for long-term stability.

Particularly, the government has allocated 60 billion VND (about USD 2.4 million) for De Gi commune, aimed at rebuilding and repairing homes for families who lost everything in the storm. The Prime Minister emphasized that this funding must be used efficiently and transparently, ensuring it directly benefits affected residents. He also called on local authorities to plan and manage coastal land not only for safe resettlement but also for economic development, tourism, and job creation, turning hardship into new opportunities for sustainable growth.

In parallel, relevant ministries and agencies are tasked with providing seeds, livestock, fertilizers, and agricultural materials to help farmers restart production quickly. Restoration of essential infrastructure — including schools, medical centers, hospitals, roads, electricity, water, and telecommunications — must be completed as soon as possible so that daily life can return to normal, ideally by November 15, 2025.

The Prime Minister also urged the State Bank of Vietnam and the Ministry of Finance to introduce preferential credit packages, debt deferrals, and tax relief measures for businesses and households affected by the storm. He called for maximum mobilization of resources — from the government, military, police, youth unions, and community volunteers — to accelerate recovery efforts and revive economic activity.

According to preliminary data, Typhoon No. 13 caused 2 deaths and 8 injuries, with estimated total damages exceeding 5,900 billion VND. More than 71,000 houses were destroyed, flooded, or damaged, including over 1,000 homes completely ruined. Thousands of hectares of rice fields, vegetables, long-term crops, and livestock farms were lost; 386 fishing boats were damaged, and many power lines, roads, and irrigation systems were destroyed.

In the immediate aftermath, the province deployed over 65,000 personnel, 1,000 vehicles, and 40 rescue boats to carry out emergency relief operations under the “Four On-the-Spot” disaster response strategy (forces, command, logistics, and materials). Over 93,000 households (341,000 people) from high-risk areas were evacuated to safety. Temporary barricades, warning signs, and 24-hour monitoring points were established at 550 vulnerable sites.

 Mother of Two in Hanoi Accuses Husband of Brutal Beating Inside Apartment: “All I Could Do Was Cover My Head and Endure”

A young woman in Hanoi has come forward to expose the domestic violence she has suffered for months. According to her account, her husband assaulted her right inside their apartment, leaving her with a ruptured eardrum, brain concussion, and multiple injuries across her body.

The victim, Nguyen Thi Thu Trang (born 1996, living in Yen Nghia Ward, Ha Dong District, Hanoi), recalled the horrifying night that took place around 9:45 p.m. on July 28 at their apartment in Dai Mo Ward.

“We had a small argument. I had barely said a few words before he lost his temper. He started hitting me with his hands and feet—on my head, face, chest, and stomach. I tried to run away, but he chased me down. Then he dragged me out into the apartment hallway and continued beating me,” Trang recounted, her voice trembling.

She said the husband’s rage went on for several minutes.
“There was an elderly woman who saw it happen but was too afraid to intervene. Only when the neighbors in our apartment group chat warned each other did people rush over to help me,” Trang said in tears.

“It took several people to stop him.”

The incident occurred in a crowded apartment complex, shocking many residents who witnessed it. Several neighbors had to physically intervene to stop the assault. After the beating, Trang was seriously injured and taken to the hospital.

Doctors diagnosed her with a ruptured eardrum, brain concussion, and multiple soft-tissue injuries. According to medical records, she was hospitalized for treatment from July 30 to August 4, suffering from exhaustion, anxiety, and psychological trauma.

Once she regained composure, Trang reported the incident to the Dai Mo Ward Police and filed an official complaint. On November 5, she underwent a medical forensic examination at the Hanoi Forensic Center.

“It’s been over three months, and my left ear still can’t hear properly. Every time the weather changes, I feel pain and constant ringing in my head,” she said.

A Marriage Full of Scars

According to Trang, marital conflicts had persisted for months, often arising from small, daily issues. She revealed that this wasn’t the first time she had been assaulted, but she endured it for the sake of her children and her hope for a peaceful family.

“I once believed he would change, but things only got worse. Sometimes, I had to hide at my neighbor’s house to avoid being beaten,” she shared.

After the latest attack, she decided to file for divorce in October, and the court is expected to issue the official decision on November 21.

Both Trang and her husband had gone through previous marriages and each had children of their own. They started living together in 2023, officially registered their marriage in March 2024, and later had a baby together.

“When my baby was just three months old, I had to go back to work to earn money. Since the divorce, I’ve been the one directly raising the child. I only wish for my kids to have a peaceful childhood, free from the violence their mother endured,” Trang said, her eyes welling up.

“I Hope the Law Protects the Vulnerable”

Despite her injuries and trauma, Trang remains determined to pursue justice.

“I just hope the authorities will handle the case strictly and make sure the abuser is held accountable. No one deserves to be beaten and live in fear,” she said firmly.

The story of this mother of two is more than a personal tragedy — it’s a wake-up call about the ongoing issue of domestic violence that continues silently behind closed doors.

Behind those apartment walls, countless women still suffer in silence, believing they must “endure” for the sake of their families — until they simply can’t anymore.

“I chose to speak up — not only for myself but for all the women who are still being hurt like I was,” Trang said, tears streaming down her face.

 In a series of recently shared photos, singer J97 appeared in a simple gray T-shirt, pants rolled up neatly, and barefoot as he joined local residents in cleaning up the streets of Hue after the floods. He helped collect trash, clear mud, and rearrange damaged belongings for the villagers. The photos quickly went viral on social media, drawing tens of thousands of comments and shares.

Under the comment section, besides some negative opinions accusing him of “putting on a show” or “image washing,” many others expressed sympathy and support:

“Helping others is always a good thing. The past is the past — what matters is what he’s doing now.”

“Well, doing something good for society is already nice. No need to judge too harshly.”

“Everyone makes mistakes, but owning up and changing is what really counts.”

“Be fair — good deeds deserve recognition.”

Earlier, on November 7, the Hanoi Department of Culture and Sports had issued an administrative fine of 55 million VND and suspended J97’s performance activities for nine months. The penalty was considered strict, reflecting the authorities’ determination to uphold cultural and artistic standards.

Now, the image of J97 in his sportswear, sweating among the crowd, perhaps makes some people see him in a slightly different light.

 now, we have to go finđing 

 How is USA?  Let's go to discover.....

Top 14 Powerful AI Tools You Must Try in 2025

1. ChatGPT.com – The Ultimate Intelligent Assistant

2. Google AI (Veo3) – Hyper-Realistic Video Generator
Type your idea and instantly get cinematic, lifelike video results.
Perfect for storytelling, commercials, and product demonstrations.

3. Kling AI – Turn Footage into Stunning Films
Transform simple photos or short clips into smooth 3D or slow-motion scenes.
Ideal for brand marketing, trailers, or viral video trends.

4. AI Studio by Google – Build AI Apps the Easy Way
Drag, drop, and connect APIs to create your own chatbot or automation system.
A game-changer for businesses looking to cut development costs.

5. Heygen.com – Realistic Talking AI Avatars
Create lifelike virtual humans who speak naturally in multiple languages.
Perfect for training videos, product presentations, and personalized marketing campaigns.

6. Gamma.app – Slides in Seconds
Type your content and instantly generate clean, professional presentations.
Useful for business pitches, reports, or educational materials.

7. Suno.ai – Create Studio-Quality Music with AI
Turn your ideas or lyrics into full, copyright-safe songs in minutes.
Perfect for YouTube creators, TikTokers, and TVC producers.

8. Fliki.ai – Turn Text into Videos Instantly
Enter your script, choose a voice, pick a style, and your video is ready.
A must-have for faceless YouTube channels and online educators.

9. MidJourney.com – The Image Factory of Imagination
Create stunning, surreal, or realistic visuals from just a few words.
Loved by designers, marketers, and creative storytellers.

10. ElevenLabs.io – Ultra-Realistic AI Voices
Generate or clone human-like voices with studio-level sound.
Perfect for podcasts, video narration, and marketing content.

11. Replit.com – Code Anything with AI
Describe what you want, and the AI writes and runs the code instantly.
Ideal for prototyping new ideas or building quick tools without a full dev team.

12. Make.com – The Ultimate Automation Platform
Connect hundreds of apps to create smart workflows with no code.
A productivity booster that saves small businesses 2–3 full-time positions.

13. Notion AI – Organize and Create Smarter
Write, summarize, brainstorm, and manage projects — all in one space.
Perfect for teams working on content, strategy, or long-term planning.

14. Runway.ml – AI-Powered Film Studio
Remove backgrounds, generate new scenes, and add visual effects in seconds.
A dream tool for filmmakers, ad producers, and creative editors.

 According to many historians, the “Lệ Chi Viên Case” was not merely a tragic accident of fate but likely a carefully staged conspiracy led by Queen Mother Nguyễn Thị Anh. Later on, Emperor Lê Thánh Tông—who posthumously cleared Nguyễn Trãi’s name—may have also known the truth. Yet, for the dignity of the royal house and to preserve the face of the Lê dynasty, he chose silence over scandal. To this day, it remains one of the most hotly debated mysteries in Vietnamese history.

The Shadows of Destiny

Records from Đông A Di Sự note that Nguyễn Trãi’s maternal grandfather was Trần Nguyên Đán, a powerful and virtuous minister of the Trần dynasty, renowned for his deep knowledge of astrology and destiny. He had foreseen the downfall of his dynasty through Hồ Quý Ly’s ambition, and in an attempt to protect his descendants, allied his family with the usurper.

As fate would have it, his grandsons—Trần Nguyên Hãn and Nguyễn Trãi—would both become national heroes. However, upon reading Nguyễn Trãi’s horoscope, Trần Nguyên Đán warned him: “Conquer the city, then withdraw.” He sensed greatness and tragedy intertwined within the same destiny—glory that would one day demand a price from three generations.

The Rise and Fall of a Scholar–Statesman

Nguyễn Trãi was instrumental in the Lam Sơn uprising against Ming invaders, drafting strategies and proclamations that led to victory in 1427. In recognition, Lê Lợi conferred upon him the title Quan Phục Hầu, along with rare honors and privileges—proof of his unmatched contribution.

However, his brilliance also made him a target. After the deaths of his allies Trần Nguyên Hãn and Phạm Văn Xảo, Nguyễn Trãi’s influence waned. He was gradually pushed away from state affairs, confined to cultural and scholarly duties. Even the royal surname “Lê” granted to him was later omitted from inscriptions.

It wasn’t until King Lê Thái Tông recognized his wisdom and recalled him to serve again that Nguyễn Trãi’s prestige was restored. By 1439, he had regained most of his former ranks. Yet, destiny had already set the stage for tragedy.

The Night at Lệ Chi Viên

In 1442, the king visited the East to inspect the troops. During his stay, Nguyễn Trãi invited him to rest at Côn Sơn. Soon after, at the “Lệ Chi Viên” (Lychee Garden), the 20-year-old king suddenly fell ill and died. Nguyễn Trãi and his wife, Lady Nguyễn Thị Lộ, were accused of regicide and sentenced to “extermination of three generations.”

But centuries later, scholars revisited the case and found clues that pointed elsewhere. Before his death, Lê Thái Tông had replaced his crown prince—Nghi Dân—with Bang Cơ, the child of Nguyễn Thị Anh. Meanwhile, Lady Ngô Thị Ngọc Dao (mother of the future king Lê Thánh Tông) was pregnant and persecuted by Nguyễn Thị Anh. Nguyễn Trãi and his wife had secretly sheltered her at temples in Hanoi and Từ Liêm, protecting her until she gave birth to Prince Tư Thành.

Such compassion, however, marked them for death. Nguyễn Thị Anh feared exposure of her son’s illegitimacy and conspired to eliminate the king during his visit—then blame Nguyễn Trãi. The perfect scapegoat was ready.

Following the king’s death, Nguyễn Trãi’s entire clan was executed. Soon after, even two eunuchs—Đinh Phúc and Đinh Thắng—who had known court secrets, were killed. Historians believe they had advised Nguyễn Trãi to tell the king about Bang Cơ’s true parentage, but he hesitated—and paid the ultimate price.

Years later, King Lê Thánh Tông reversed the verdict, honoring Nguyễn Trãi with the words:
“The heart of Ức Trai shines bright as the Khuê Star.”

In 1464, the king officially pardoned him, restoring his descendants’ names and titles.

Modern scholars—including Phan Duy Kha, Đinh Công Vĩ, and Lã Duy Lan—have offered compelling evidence supporting the theory that Nguyễn Thị Anh orchestrated the conspiracy. Their findings were detailed in the book “Lễ Nghi Học Sĩ Nguyễn Thị Lộ và Thảm Án Lệ Chi Viên” (2004), restoring the dignity of two unjustly condemned souls after centuries of silence.